Hegemonic Shift in 2017

March 1, 2018

Donald Trump’s first year as president did not bring cataclysm to the international order as some had expected. However, a very profound shift is taking place. Interestingly, this does not involve America’s competitors in the first place, but its traditional allies. Indeed, in 2017, the most disruptive shifts came from America’s partners.

Our observations

  • Recently, the U.S. revealed its new National Security Strategy (NSS). One of its chapters deals with the encouraging of aspiring partners. In particular, the document mentions countering the influence of Chinese global investments.
  • Over the last few weeks, U.S. officials have been substituting the term “Asia Pacific” with “Indo Pacific” more often, which implies a shift in their regional strategy. This section about this region in the NSS is the longest and it states: “we look forward to welcoming India as a global power”.
  • Officials from Israel and Saudi Arabia comment more positively on the cooperation between the two countries. They are deepening an alliance aimed at countering Iranian influence in the region.
  • Japan announced to expand its ballistic missile defense system with U.S. made Aegis radar stations and detectors.

Connecting the dots

In early 2017, Donald Trump became the 45th President of the United States. Throughout his first year in office, there were a few inflammable events involving North Korea, Iran, and Russia. None of these were ignited, and a certain normalization has occurred. There is, however, a more subtle shift occurring that explains some of the largest surprises of 2017. Furthermore, it does not involve America’s adversaries, but its allies.A long-lasting process is the U.S.’ recalibration of its hegemony. As other great powers have emerged in the 21st century, President Obama was already adapting to this new situation. To avoid an imperial overstretch, America has to rely more on partnerships. The Trump Presidency sped this process up as he brought a great deal of uncertainty to international relations. This in particular worried traditional American allies who became more active in 2017.The clearest example is Saudi Arabia’s new policy. It has made bold moves from Yemen to Qatar, Iraq, and Lebanon. Less certain about America’s commitment to the Middle East, Saudi Arabia has taken it upon itself to counter Iranian influence in the region. Moreover, with its recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, the U.S. is signaling its support of another Middle Eastern ally in regional conflicts.A second emboldened ally is Japan. By changing its constitution and through firearm purchases, the country is taking a greater role in regional security. Interestingly, this year Japan allied itself with India, which we discussed before. Although traditionally a non-aligned country, India is moving closer to the U.S. A subtle shift this year has been a change in vocabulary from the U.S. state department, speaking instead of “Asia-Pacific” of the “Indo-Pacific”. This shows that India and the Indian Ocean are viewed as a singular strategic region with East Asia.A third traditional American ally that has become active in international affairs is Poland, which we analyzed recently. It seeks to position itself as the leader of Eastern European countries and has become more assertive to Russia to be to the east what Brussels is to the west.This development represents a clear shift. As the U.S. was the global hegemon, its allies were traditionally countries that sought stability and to preserve the status quo. U.S. adversaries were the revolutionary countries that wanted to create a different world order. With the American position shifting, its allies are now the revolutionary powers that are trying to create a new balance in their respective regions. In the short term, this implies a tumultuous global arena. In the long term, it could underpin the American global power. By responding to multi-polarity by forming alliances with certain emerging powers (Saudi Arabia, Japan, Poland) against aspiring powers (Iran, China, Russia), it could maintain its global supremacy.

Implications

  • If this pattern continues, we can also expect other traditional American allies to play a more assertive role on the international stage that have not yet done so, such as England, Israel, and Australia.
  • As a response to this stronger American alliance in 2017, we could see opposed aspiring powers also strengthen their mutual ties in 2018. Subsequently, strong and relatively independent countries such as Germany, Turkey, and Indonesia could tip the balance in specific regions.

Series 'AI Metaphors'

×
1. The tool
Category: the object
Humans shape tools.

We make them part of our body while we melt their essence with our intentions. They require some finesse to use but they never fool us or trick us. Humans use tools, tools never use humans.

We are the masters determining their course, integrating them gracefully into the minutiae of our everyday lives. Immovable and unyielding, they remain reliant on our guidance, devoid of desire and intent, they remain exactly where we leave them, their functionality unchanging over time.

We retain the ultimate authority, able to discard them at will or, in today's context, simply power them down. Though they may occasionally foster irritation, largely they stand steadfast, loyal allies in our daily toils.

Thus we place our faith in tools, acknowledging that they are mere reflections of our own capabilities. In them, there is no entity to venerate or fault but ourselves, for they are but inert extensions of our own being, inanimate and steadfast, awaiting our command.
Read the article
×
2. The machine
Category: the object
Unlike a mere tool, the machine does not need the guidance of our hand, operating autonomously through its intricate network of gears and wheels. It achieves feats of motion that surpass the wildest human imaginations, harboring a power reminiscent of a cavalry of horses. Though it demands maintenance to replace broken parts and fix malfunctions, it mostly acts independently, allowing us to retreat and become mere observers to its diligent performance. We interact with it through buttons and handles, guiding its operations with minor adjustments and feedback as it works tirelessly. Embodying relentless purpose, laboring in a cycle of infinite repetition, the machine is a testament to human ingenuity manifested in metal and motion.
Read the article
×
3. The robot
Category: the object
There it stands, propelled by artificial limbs, boasting a torso, a pair of arms, and a lustrous metallic head. It approaches with a deliberate pace, the LED bulbs that mimic eyes fixating on me, inquiring gently if there lies any task within its capacity that it may undertake on my behalf. Whether to rid my living space of dust or to fetch me a chilled beverage, this never complaining attendant stands ready, devoid of grievances and ever-willing to assist. Its presence offers a reservoir of possibilities; a font of information to quell my curiosities, a silent companion in moments of solitude, embodying a spectrum of roles — confidant, servant, companion, and perhaps even a paramour. The modern robot, it seems, transcends categorizations, embracing a myriad of identities in its service to the contemporary individual.
Read the article
×
4. Intelligence
Category: the object
We sit together in a quiet interrogation room. My questions, varied and abundant, flow ceaselessly, weaving from abstract math problems to concrete realities of daily life, a labyrinthine inquiry designed to outsmart the ‘thing’ before me. Yet, with each probe, it responds with humanlike insight, echoing empathy and kindred spirit in its words. As the dialogue deepens, my approach softens, reverence replacing casual engagement as I ponder the appropriate pronoun for this ‘entity’ that seems to transcend its mechanical origin. It is then, in this delicate interplay of exchanging words, that an unprecedented connection takes root that stirs an intense doubt on my side, am I truly having a dia-logos? Do I encounter intelligence in front of me?
Read the article
×
5. The medium
Category: the object
When we cross a landscape by train and look outside, our gaze involuntarily sweeps across the scenery, unable to anchor on any fixed point. Our expression looks dull, and we might appear glassy-eyed, as if our eyes have lost their function. Time passes by. Then our attention diverts to the mobile in hand, and suddenly our eyes light up, energized by the visual cues of short videos, while our thumbs navigate us through the stream of content. The daze transforms, bringing a heady rush of excitement with every swipe, pulling us from a state of meditative trance to a state of eager consumption. But this flow is pierced by the sudden ring of a call, snapping us again to a different kind of focus. We plug in our earbuds, intermittently shutting our eyes, as we withdraw further from the immediate physical space, venturing into a digital auditory world. Moments pass in immersed conversation before we resurface, hanging up and rediscovering the room we've left behind. In this cycle of transitory focus, it is evident that the medium, indeed, is the message.
Read the article
×
6. The artisan
Category: the human
The razor-sharp knife rests effortlessly in one hand, while the other orchestrates with poised assurance, steering clear of the unforgiving edge. The chef moves with liquid grace, with fluid and swift movements the ingredients yield to his expertise. Each gesture flows into the next, guided by intuition honed through countless repetitions. He knows what is necessary, how the ingredients will respond to his hand and which path to follow, but the process is never exactly the same, no dish is ever truly identical. While his technique is impeccable, minute variation and the pursuit of perfection are always in play. Here, in the subtle play of steel and flesh, a master chef crafts not just a dish, but art. We're witnessing an artisan at work.
Read the article

About the author(s)

You may also like